StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

International Political Economy in Theoretical Traditions - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay describes international political economy in terms of main theoretical traditions, in particular in mercantilism, liberalism, and Marxism. It also oultines the theory of hegemonic stability and compares various perspectives…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.5% of users find it useful
International Political Economy in Theoretical Traditions
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "International Political Economy in Theoretical Traditions"

International Political Economy Introduction The term “political economy” makes it clear that the phenomenon lies at the crossroads of politics and economics. In other words, political economy describes how political power influences economic results and how the economic factors affect politics. Thus, international political economy revolves around activities which take place among international actors like states, global corporations, international organisations, and social movements. Admittedly, there are a large number of theoretical frameworks in international political economy (IPE). Traditionally, the questions of international political economy have been discussed along three theoretical traditions. They are mercantilism, liberalism, and Marxism. Mercantilism and international political economy Admittedly, mercantilism advocates extensive state regulation of economic activity for the sake of national economy. That means mercantilism wants to have all economic activities subservient to the interests of the state. The theory argues that if there is no formal authority given to the state, the result will be a ‘state of nature’ which is marked by brutality. So, it is necessary to surrender individual preferences and likes to universal good. Thus, according to mercantilism, collectivism is more important than individualism, and strengthening of state’s power and wealth is the best way to ensure public welfare (Keegley and Blanton 2012, p.457). The early mercantilists took into consideration the fact that the wealth of a nation is measured in the form of the quantity of gold and silver in its public treasury. In order to strengthen the same, the government intervenes in the local and international economy. While the state activity in the domestic economy includes effective collection of revenues, the efforts in the international sphere appear in the form of protectionism. In other words, mercantilism argues that the solution to solve inequality for a state is to ensure balance of trade. In the words of Crane (1997, p. 35), a state is supposed to run a balance of trade surplus, maintain an inflow of specie, in order to retain its position in the international economy where all states are acting in self-interest. Liberalism and political economy Later on, Adam Smith started criticising the claims of mercantilism, and developed a new line of thinking. According to him (cited in Sally 2002, p. 112), the market has an ‘invisible hand’ of itself, which is sufficient to meet the self-interests. In other words, when markets function freely, based upon division of labour, there will be maximum efficiency and growth; and the claim is that the political intervention in the market only results in a weakening of the fortunate results of free markets (ibid). Thus, the liberalism draws out the implications of comparative advantage and free trade. When one moves from the national economy to the world economy, one can see that there is the possibility of reaching equilibrium in international economic relations without state interventions. According to the quantity theory of money, changes in reserves are directly linked to changes in domestic prices; that means if there is a market that is free from political influences, trade and payment imbalances will reach equilibrium automatically (Rosow 1997, p. 42). If this point is explained further, liberalism points out that growth and equilibrium should be reached through comparative advantage and free trade. That means, every nation is supposed to find and specialise in the area where it can introduce products with comparative advantage. Thus, liberalism is basically against the notion of war because war, or the use of power by states, is the result of misunderstanding of the national interests. According to liberalism, peace serves the interests of every country, and war or the use of force weakens the productive capability of every nation and drain wealth and power (Watson 2009, p. 37). In other words, liberalism claims that the free trade is based on mutual interest and hence, even without the presence of political institutions, it is possible to retain world peace. Marxism and IPE The basic assumption of Marx is that human motivations and orientations are purely dependent on the material environment that surrounds the people at the given point of time. Thus, Marx does not see people as absolute, rational egoists. According to Marx, human history is marked by various modes of production ranging from feudalism to capitalism. In other words, there will be periodical changes in the modes of production from time to time in human history. To illustrate, capitalism is marked by alienation of workers from their products of their labour and exploitation of workers (Burnham, n.d); and evidently, it is this class system which gives the necessary social situation required for the amassing of capital. This surplus gained through the selling of the products should be properly reinvested by the capitalists for survival. If they fail to accumulate, they are in danger of getting driven out of the market by competitors. However, despite this accumulation, capitalism is prone to crisis, breakdown, and revolution. In other words, in the opinion of Marx, there should be a growing inequality between the capitalists and the working class in order to facilitate revolution and new forms of production. Thus, through the concept of historical materialism, Marx puts forward the idea that every nation in the world must experience a stage of capitalist development. Admittedly, the points put forward by Marx were not sufficient to describe IPE, but his followers introduced better explanations and expansions for the IPE foundations laid by Marx (International Socialism, 2007). To illustrate, according to Lenin, accumulation of capital leads to another stage called imperialism at which capitalists try to expand internationally. It happens when the opportunities for continued growth are not available in the domestic market. Thus, capitalists start looking for foreign lands where investment opportunities, new markets, or raw materials are available. However, the internationalization of capital is often hindered by the state territories, and the capitalists overcome these hindrances using their influence and power. However, sooner or later, the national monopolies will start competing with each other, resulting in the Great Power war. Thus, Lenin too agrees with Marx in the fact that due to increased capitalist investment, every nation will undergo capitalist development (Jeong, 2011). Thus, the result will be an economic delay or dilemma which Europe will face. The theory of hegemonic stability In fact, the hegemonic stability concept is the creation of Charles P. Kindleberger in the early postwar era. According to the theory, the hegemon is a rich, powerful and influential state which undertakes the task of offering public goods to the international system. Such public goods vary from stable money, security, and a free trade, which every nation can freely enjoy. Admittedly, it is costly to ensure all these facilities. However, the hegemon still gains and prospers because of its dominant position in the world economy. When the world prospers, the hegemon too prospers. In fact, the hegemon is promoting the provision of public goods in order to ensure its long term survival in the dominant position (Media Wiki, 2010). Thus, one gains the insight that according to the theory of hegemonic stability, it is necessary to have a hegemon in the world to organize and coordinate the provision of international goods (Guzzini 1998, p. 143). In fact, this theory is supported by the example of the existence of the Dutch, The British, and the U.S during different periods of time. It also becomes evident that whenever this dominance of the hegemon is questioned or threatened, the international system falls into total anarchy and conflict (ibid). This, in turn, results in a fall in peace, growth, and prosperity. A comparison of the various perspectives Thus, it becomes evident that the various theoretical frameworks possess totally different views regarding international political economy. So, the solutions they suggest too considerably vary in nature. To illustrate, according to Marx, there is a historical materialism, and the means of production will change from time to time. That means all the world states will gain some prosperity through capitalism at one stage. However, as capitalism is based on alienation of workers from the products of their work, and exploitation of workers, there will be increasing unrest, followed by revolution. It is this revolution that will help reduce inequality in both domestic and international sphere. Thus, according to Marx, the struggle between classes and the consequent revolution is the way to equality. In the words of Marx, state is only an apparatus used by the capitalists to retain their power in capitalism. On the other hand, mercantilism believes in the active intervention of the state in both domestic and international economy. The theory argues that every state should develop such policies which are totally aimed at the welfare of the state. Thus, the solution to inequality, according to mercantilism, lies in ensuring a balance of trade through state intervention so that the state manages to get some trade surplus. On the other hand, liberalism is against any state intervention. Instead, it points out that the economy has its own system to reach equilibrium of trade, and this equilibrium will serve the interest of all. In other words, the market should be free from political influences to reach equilibrium through free trade and comparative advantage. However, the concept of hegemonic stability has introduced a view that is totally different. The theory points out that it is necessary for the world economy to have some dominant or ‘hegemonic’ states, which ensure basic requirements like free trade, stable money and security. It seems that the hegemonic stability supports the rationality of imperialism. The point is that when a dominant nation ensures that such an economy prevails, all other nations get a chance to prosper along with the hegemon. Thus, the situation benefits all and reduces inequality. Conclusion In total, both mercantilism and hegemonic stability think active governmental intervention is necessary to reduce inequality in international political economy. While the former says governments should act in self-interest, the latter says there should be one government that takes a dominant position to ensure free trade, stable money, and security. However, liberalism believes in the autonomy of market without governmental interventions, and lastly, Marx think equality can be brought about through revolution. References Burnham, P., n.d. Marx, international political economy and globalization. Marx, IPE and Globalization, pp. 103-112. [Online] Available at [Accessed 19 June 2012] Crane, G. T. and Amawi, A., 1997. The Theoretical Evolution of International Political Economy: A Reader. New York: Oxford University Press. Guzzini, S., 1998. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London: Routledge. International Socialism, 2006. Marxist political economy and the crisis. A Quarterly Journal of Socialist Theory. [Online] Available at [Accessed 19 June 2012] Jeong, S., 2011. Lenins economics: A Marxian critique. Research in Political Economy, 27, pp. 223-254. Keegley, C. W. and Blanton, S. L., 2012. World Politics: Trend and Transformation. USA: Cengage Learning. Media Wiki, 2010. Hegemonic stability theory. [Online] Available at [Accessed 19 June 2012] Rosow, S. J., 1997. Echoes of commercial society: Liberal political theory in main stream IPE. In K. Burch and R. A (Eds) Denemark Constituting International Political Economy, p. 35. USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Sally, S., 2002. Classical Liberalism and International Economic Order (Routledge Advances in International Political Economy). UK: Taylor & Francis. Watson, A. M. S., 2009. The Child in International Political Economy: A Place at the Table. New York: Routledge. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(International Political Economy in Theoretical Traditions Essay, n.d.)
International Political Economy in Theoretical Traditions Essay. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1777266-what-are-the-dominant-theoretical-frameworks-used-for-analysing-international-political-economy-compare-and-contrast-their-recommended-solutions-to-problems-of-global-wealth-inequality
(International Political Economy in Theoretical Traditions Essay)
International Political Economy in Theoretical Traditions Essay. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1777266-what-are-the-dominant-theoretical-frameworks-used-for-analysing-international-political-economy-compare-and-contrast-their-recommended-solutions-to-problems-of-global-wealth-inequality.
“International Political Economy in Theoretical Traditions Essay”. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1777266-what-are-the-dominant-theoretical-frameworks-used-for-analysing-international-political-economy-compare-and-contrast-their-recommended-solutions-to-problems-of-global-wealth-inequality.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF International Political Economy in Theoretical Traditions

Late Capitalism and the World System

In their theories, there is no examination of the ecological implications of modernism or the theoretical practices of postmodernism in relation with the environment to assess whether they repress modernist assumptions or encourage non-exploitation.... Now, it is a reduced theoretical political memory in both mainstreams in international relations writing mentioned only as interesting historical lineage (Gray 47).... According to scholarly research findings, David Harvey and Yoshihiro Francis are some of the prominent theorists of late capitalism and their works contribute enormously to social and political debates....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

International Relations

Moreover, it has been revealed that certain of the core ideas of the traditional and the contemporary international relations theories are more persuasive than others, a fact leading to the assumption that both these frameworks have strengths and weaknesses and that their combination could led to the development of an effective theoretical framework in order to explain the political and social beliefs and practices as developed in the context of international relations.... The borders between the above two theoretical concepts are not clear – maybe because these concepts tend to interact when current political and social phenomena have to be interpreted....
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework

Theoretical Perspectives and the Strong Argument

hellip; In general, theory of global policy or international relations theory must be traced to at least three principal theoretical traditions, such as Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism.... Professor Name Subject 8 May 2000 On Global Politics: theoretical Perspectives and the Strong Argument Global Politics: theoretical Perspectives To begin with, we need to force the distinction between the two chapters within the paper.... Accordingly, the first one will be dedicated to the theoretical perspectives of global politics, whereas the second one is about how to build the strong argument in order to explain what theory is considered as more applicable for me personally....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Tianxia in Chinese Moral or Political Thinking

This research work is to examine how the Tianxia system is employed to solve the world's problems and the institutions that come with it; it also examines the theoretical and past problems caused by the Tianxia system and its application in the present world order.... hellip; This research tells that Tianxia is a notion embodied by the Chinese that literally means all under heaven and is integrated within the Chinese moral or political thinking.... Normatively, Tianxia refers to all the people or the world institution, in understanding this, scholars have interdependently directed arguments that would solve problems not only in political philosophy, but also in political science, and this has the effect of unifying the world and the thoughts too....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Liberalism in International Political Economy Compared with Marxism and Realism

This paper analyzes Liberalism in international political economy compared with Marxism and Realism.... Liberalism is related to classical economics, wherein power is put on merchants, markets and privatized enterprises while the governmental influence on economic growth is reduced....
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper

International Political Theorie

Realim Realim wa the dominant theoretical tradition throughout the Cold War.... Why hould policymaker and practitioner care about the cholarly tudy of international affair Thoe who conduct foreign policy often dimi academic theorit (frequently, one mut admit, with good reaon), but there i an inecapable link between the abtract world of theory and the real world of policy.... Everyone ue theorie--whether he or he know it or not--and diagreement about policy uually ret on more fundamental diagreement about the baic force that hape international outcome....
18 Pages (4500 words) Coursework

Political Economy Approach to Creative and Cultural Industries

The world economy in general and the national economies in particular, in twenty first century, are more or less dominated by post-industrial knowledge-based exchanges.... Primary production or manufacturing is becoming decreasingly important sectors of the postmodern economy.... The state considerably regulates the cultural industry as a sector of economy but not without political implications.... The dynamics and complexities of the relationships between culture, creative industries and the political and economic development of societies have gained the attention of theorists and researchers from the mid-twentieth century itself....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

The Theoretical Framework of International Relations

The paper 'The theoretical Framework of International Relations' presents the debates over the prospects of co-operation between and among the states that have intensified in an unprecedented way.... Within the theoretical framework of international relations, such debates are nurtured.... hellip; Liberalism and realism share many concepts and theoretical tools pertaining to international relations, the picture of the world we can derive from their analysis is radically different....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us