StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The US and Canadian Copyright Law - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The US and Canadian Copyright Law" tells that even though the US and Canadian copyright law partake in a common history thus embracing related principles. On the other hand, there are some factors of US copyright law that disagree considerably with its Canadian counterpart…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.7% of users find it useful
The US and Canadian Copyright Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The US and Canadian Copyright Law"

Running Head: Infringement of copyright Law in US and Canada s Infringement of copyright Law in US and Canada Abstract Even though the US and Canadian copyright law partake in a common history thus embracing related principles. On the other hand, there are some factors of US copyright law that disagree considerably from its Canadian counterpart. The most important dissimilar factor is with regard to the constitutionalization of the federal governments authority to support "Progress of Science and useful Arts" via copyright law, provisos for derivative infringement, and fair use requirements. In disparity, Canadian copyright law does not constitutionalize provision defining the intention of copyright laws. Consequently, copyright law functions more as a tool to defend creators and not as a system promoting innovation and creativity. Indirect infringement in the US comes under vicarious liability (Shapiro, Bernstein v. HL Green 326 F.2d 304 (2nd Cir. 1963)) and/or contributory liability (Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. 417 (1984)). Where as, in Canada indirect infringement is known as secondary infringement. At the same time with regard to "fair use" doctrine this doctrine can be used in the US in a very broad sense than in Canada. This means that the provisions of fair use are more liberally interpreted in the US than they are in Canada. This is the background of the discussion for this paper. Introduction The most important factor of copyright law is linked to the public interest. Copyright law actually protects and for ever tries to equalize the requirement for motivators for creativeness and the requirement to allow society to approach works created (B Kaplan, 1967; P Goldstein, 1970; R C Denicola, 1979; M J Radin, 1982; D Baird, 1983 and I E Novos and M Waldman, 1984). Widening the security rendered by copyright furnishes better incentives for generators, but constricts the public area, that is, the general cultural resources to which the public has contact. Bringing in the right balance linking adequate incentives for originality and limiting the public domain has at all times been, and yet is, one of the major tests of copyright law. The Canadian and US laws look very different on their face as one anticipates different consequences in both the countries with regard to infringement of copyright laws. This is true only to a certain extent. Therefore, when a report is published by the Canadian government or a group which is the agent of the crown can claim copyright of the report in Canada (Dableh v. Ontario Hydro, 1993)i. Whereas the same report, if published by any arm of the US federal government, cannot claim copyright in the US (Goldstein, 1989).ii Since the federal and provincial governments are not attached by the Copyright act they are untouched by suits for infringement.iii But in the US it is not the same as infringement of copyright can bring action. iv Indirect Infringement The US law has established that under fitting conditions, one person can be held responsible for the infringement of the work of another. Actually under the circumstances the facilitating party is held responsible for copyright infringement. Thus in the US there are 2 general law philosophies for indirect infringement; 1. Vicarious liability. 2. Contributory liability (http://www.innovationlaw.org/projects/dcr/copyright/ uscopyright.htm accessed December 1 2009). Vicarious liability will be inflicted on those who possess the strength to administer or direct the infringer and thus derive a financial concern in the infringer’s activities. This holds good even if the person who controls is not aware of the infringement. For instance, the parent company of chain stores will be responsible for the acts of its franchisee. This means that if a franchisee sells counterfeit products then the parent company will be held responsible (Shapiro, Bernstein v. HL Green 326 F.2d 304 (2nd Cir. 1963)) (http://www.innovationlaw.org/projects/dcr/copyright/uscopyright.htm accessed December 1 2009). Contributory liability is direct infringement and the infringer’s conduct is known to the other party. The infringing action, stimulates, causes, or materially leads to the infringing conduct of another (http://www.innovationlaw.org/ projects/dcr/copyright/ uscopyright.htm accessed December 1 2009). In Canada, indirect infringement is known as secondary infringement. It is dealt with under section 27(2) of the Copyright Act. This Act says that the person who distributes or sells or even exhibits or may be even rents such kind of work knowingly they are infringements will also be held liable (http://www.innovationlaw.org/projects /dcr/copyright/uscopyright.htm accessed December 1 2009). Fair Use The fair use doctrine is dealt with under Section 107 of the US Copyright Act. This doctrine allows for some amount of copying and dispersion without consent from the copyright holder or even with making any payment. Fair use includes the utilities for intentions like criticism, news reporting, comment, scholarship, teaching or research (http://www.innovationlaw.org/ projects/dcr/copyright/ uscopyright.htm accessed December 1 2009). Where as the list of the Canadian doctrine of fair dealing, is not exhaustive like that of the US. But the US courts have of late extended the list of fair intentions to let in mockery or satire. This indicates that the provisions of fair use are more generously understood than in Canada (http://www.innovationlaw.org/projects/dcr/copyright/ uscopyright.htm accessed December 1 2009). The American theory of fair dealing as provided under 17 USC 107 is; "the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright" (http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107000-.html Retrieved December 1, 2009). The section further states that the factors which are to be taken into account before deciding as to whether the use of any work for any particular case is a fair use or not is as follows: "(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for non-profit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work" (http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107000-.html Retrieved December 1, 2009). This section17 USC 107 has derived its definition based on a number of US Supreme Court cases which started with the judgment of Souter J in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 U.S. 569 (1994)). The functioning of the American doctrine of estoppels and implied license in fair dealing is set out in the case of Sony Entertainment Inc. and Others v Connectix Corporation  Cornell LII (Case No:99-15852 ). Reed J in the case of Barbara Hager v ECW Press Ltd. and Others [1999] 2 FC, 287 summarized the key difference between the two concepts of fair dealing and fair use as follows: "The concept of fair dealing in s. 29, 29.1 and 29.2 of the [Canadian] Copyright Act is quite different from that of fair use in the United States. The most significant difference is that under Canadian copyright law the use of the copied material must come within one of the specific purposes identified in the statute: research or private study (section 29), criticism or review (section 29.1), or news reporting (section 29.2)"  (http://www.ipit-update.com/copy37.htm Retrieved December 1, 2009). References 1. B Kaplan An Unhurried View of Copyright (Columbia University Press New York 1967) 2. D Baird Common Law Intellectual Property and the Legacy of International News Service V. Associated Press (1983) 50 Chicago L Rev 411 3. I E Novos and M Waldman The Effect of Increased Copyright Protection: An Analytic Approach (1984) 92 J Political Economy 236 4. http://www.innovationlaw.org/projects/dcr/copyright/uscopyright.htm accessed1 December 2009 5. http://www.ipit-update.com/copy37.htm Retrieved December 1, 2009 6. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107000-.html Retrieved December 1, 2009 7. M J Radin Property and Personhood (1982) 34 Stanford L Rev 957 8. P Goldstein Copyright and the First Amendment (1970) 70 Columbia L Rev 983 9. R C Denicola Copyright and Free Speech: Constitutional Limitations on the Protection of Expression (1979) 67 California L Rev 283 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Law Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Law Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1560254-law
(Law Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Law Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1560254-law.
“Law Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1560254-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The US and Canadian Copyright Law

A Certain Shift in the Requirements for Originality of Author Works and Copyrights

Likewise, In Spain Article 1 of the Real Decreto Legislativo 1/1996, de 12 de Abril, which is Spain's main copyright law states that "The intellectual property of a literary, artistic or scientific work is entitled to its author for the sole fact of its creation.... The law towards the protection of software copyrights is statutory.... n the UAE, Federal law No.... his is called copyright.... Different countries have different laws regarding copyright issues of different author works....
4 Pages (1000 words) Coursework

WIPO, Berne, TRIPS, Copyright Law and their Implications for Google

The provision of adequate rewards to creators of works is considered to be dependent in modern times upon the adequate recognition and enforcement of the rights given to those creators by copyright law.... International copyright law has recognised the need for this balance but the exact nature of the appropriate balance has been contentious.... It will then proceed to consider the changes in international copyright law brought about by the TRIPS Agreement and the WIPO Copyright Treaty to establish whether the balance as now recognised in international copyright law is different from that originally recognised by the Berne Convention....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Difference in Downloading Music in the USA and Canada

he DMCA and the United States copyright law also outlaw making copies of copyrighted music, unless it is for personal use.... So if one wishes to download that composition, it is recommended under the provisions of the US copyright law and the DMCA that he does it from an authorized legal site, by purchasing it from the provider.... Examples of law cases based on illegal MP3 downloads will be produced and analyzed.... urthermore, peer-to-peer sharing is also prohibited under the law regulations....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper

Copyright Laws in Canada and the USA

In this paper, the author's main objective is to identify these infringements and to analyze the legislative acts that regulate this domain, both in Canada and the In this context, some cases will be described and analyzed, in order to understand the law's influence on the reality.... The rapid development of the technology, of the Internet and the possibility to share any kind of information over the net makes copyright infringements easy and accessible.... ne of the most important acts that protects the copyright holders in Canada is the copyright Act....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper

The Effect of Fair Dealing for Digital Content in Canadian Education System-Distance Education

The law Society of Upper Canada is a statutory, non-profit organization.... This paper "The Effect of Fair Dealing for Digital Content in Canadian Education System-Distance Education" focuses on the consequences of copyright laws and fair dealing on digital content and distance education; with reference to the CCH, (2004) case.... This leads to issues related to copyright and intellectual ownership.... As digital content is an integral part of distance education, copyright issues emerge....
22 Pages (5500 words) Research Paper

Copyrights in the Music Industry: Exclusive Legal Rights

The amendments were aimed at modernization of the canadian copyright law.... S, the law on technological designs is similar to the one in Canada (Buckingham, 1836).... This paper "Copyrights in the Music Industry: Exclusive Legal Rights" focuses on the Actions of companies that copyright the works of an artist.... It is important to keep the concerns of consumers in mind when formulating copyright laws.... Substantial amendments were made in Canada to the copyright Act in 2012....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

The Copyright Law Definition

This report "The copyright law Definition" discusses copyright an institution built on intellectual since it drags down thoughts into the private domain where no one can make use of it and no one would be able to develop it to a better aesthetic expression.... The primary purpose of the copyright law is to encourage authors to create and write original works and materials for the development of the intellect and arts while placing a monetary value on the work....
6 Pages (1500 words) Report

Intellectual Property Law UG

art 1 Proposed Research QuestionThe purpose of Australian copyright law under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) and 'International conventions', is to protect an author's creative works in any of the literary, arts and sciences.... Generally, the paper "Intellectual Property law UG" is a perfect example of a law assignment.... The proposed question discusses an Australian case law under the Copyright Act 1968 and makes a comparison with the Canadian case law experience....
14 Pages (3500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us