StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Merit of the US Military Intervention - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Merit of the US Military Intervention " discusses that naturally, national interests are one of the key matters in such a decision. As we remember the November 1979 U.S. hostage situation in Iran, we cannot deny that the need to rescue American citizens was against national interest. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
The Merit of the US Military Intervention
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Merit of the US Military Intervention"

Our interest in this essay will be to question ourselves in the decision-making process of such intervention and of the realization of this involvement in foreign policy. Military intervention is often considered as the last resort after all political and diplomatic ways to tackle a conflict have been used. Nevertheless, even if these resources have been unsuccessful, a country shall not engage in battle without questioning itself on whether to engage military forces. U.S. foreign policy has shown that this question shall be carefully thought. 

Nevertheless, one shall not consider national interest an excuse to intervene but a reason. Furthermore, it is sometimes difficult for Presidents to point out the benefits of such interventions to the public, therefore creating a paradoxical situation where defending vital interests the U.S. Government is faced with people’s lack of understanding and even disapproval of the intervention. Why send our troops so far and spend hundreds of millions of dollars in such a war? As Richard Haass points out in The debate over intervention “ The United States can stay involved either if costs are low or if interest is high”.

In these decision-taking moments, the President could benefit from the support of the public and the Congress, but clearly, it means consulting them which can take away the benefits of the surprise and takes a certain time. Understandingly, the President has to make a quick but well-thought move and also take necessary measures to have both the approval of the public and the Congress if the conflict is meant to last.

This is the reason why while choosing to intervene the President has to set clear objectives which according to Haass, should aim towards a unique goal. The case of the Bosnian war shows the drawback of having several goals at the same time. In 1993-1994, the U.S. military was not able to achieve successful peace-making nor completely efficient humanitarian help.

Knowing the place where the fights are going to take place as much as the enemy is as important as the intervention itself. Though it is vital in a regular intervention, it is even more crucial where the President is considering sending troops to tackle civil wars, revolutions or failed states. Vietnam showed us that without enough data about the field and the adversary, the war is keen to last over and over. As one can never predict what will happen on the battlefield, it is a mistake to try to set up the end of the intervention. This was also a lesson that was learned in Vietnam, soldiers went to fight several weeks and came home years after.

Finally, we should not forget that the opponent is not the only audience and that in case of such interventions we have to consider the other countries who have ties with the one the intervention is supposed to take place and the international political opinion on that intervention.

 Once the decision of intervening is made, it is important to see how this intervention is going to be realized. As we said before, an intervention is considered when all the other diplomatic and political solutions have proved useless. Although, the intervention has to be considered as a last resort, waiting too long to intervene could be a real danger. In 1994, U.S. troops were sent to Sarajevo to protect the Muslim population against the Serbs. Though it was a necessary decision for the Muslims remaining it proved that waiting so long failed to prevent numerous massacres.

The difficult question is the number of men to send during an intervention. Where sending a few bits of help in keeping the public’s support, appears useless and wasteful on the battlefield. Haass clearly states his point of view “Too much force is better than too little”. If the conflict lasts, it is more likely that the loss is going to be heavier. By sending too much, it allows important and separate attacks from the beginning – opposite to gradual attacks which proved inefficient in Vietnam for example -  which will confuse the adversary.   

Added to these measures, the air control and the technology used are strong assets in winning strategic positions but must not be considered as the key factors of victory. These are only meant to ensure victory as Haass points but as proved in The Gulf War with the inefficiency to destroy Iraq’s mobile ballistic missiles, they have to be combined with a ground offensive.

As a conclusion, we shall think back on the past two decades’ U.S. military intervention through the different aspects that we have seen in this essay and draw aside our preconceptions to see these matter as complicated as it is.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“American Foreign Policy The merit of the U.S. military intervention : Essay”, n.d.)
American Foreign Policy The merit of the U.S. military intervention : Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1509608-american-foreign-policy-essay
(American Foreign Policy The Merit of the U.S. Military Intervention : Essay)
American Foreign Policy The Merit of the U.S. Military Intervention : Essay. https://studentshare.org/politics/1509608-american-foreign-policy-essay.
“American Foreign Policy The Merit of the U.S. Military Intervention : Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1509608-american-foreign-policy-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Merit of the US Military Intervention

Has international intervention trying to end violent ethno-national conflict had successful outcomes

?? Allegedly to prevent further use of force by Slobodan Milosevic, the US-led military intervention of NATO charged in, conducting air strike upon air strike, cloaked by Resolutions 1160 and 1199 of the United Nations Security Council.... The military intervention had been nothing if not controversial, with the main problematic stated most elegantly by Chomsky, who stated: There is at least a tension, if not an outright contradiction, between the rules of world order laid down in the United Nation Charter and the rights articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UD)....
17 Pages (4250 words) Essay

Five Roads to the Future: Power in the Next Global Age By Paul Starobin

Colonial powers with the fond remembrance of their bygone heydays in the countries in which they once dominated will now try to exert influence through economic and military baits 3.... How city councils can perform functions like military deployment, maintain international relations etc are not explained....
4 Pages (1000 words) Book Report/Review

International Law and Humanitarian Issues

Unless, a country seeks for intervention then the UN cannot intervene in some situations.... For instance, the 2008 Myanmar Cyclone was a great catastrophe that required humanitarian intervention but the UN did not intervene (Dunoff, 2010).... For instance, Canada in the year 2000, established the International Commission on intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Critically assess the merits of the international intervention in Kosovo

But whenever this need for justification is posed to NATO, they are quick to defend the merit in the intervention, saying that there was a specific target in this case, who were the Serbs.... The international intervention in Kosovo in 1999, which was largely led by the United States and NATO have come under intense scrutiny and review by scholars, the legal fraternity, historians, and the media.... Even though the NATO and the United States had their own reasons and justifications for undertaking the international intervention they took in Kosovo, not much of these commentators who have researched and analyzed the events in the lead up to the intervention and the events specifically involved in the events seem to be convinced by the actions taken by the international bodies who staged their interventions in Kosovo....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Cold war 1989-1991 under Bush's Administration

Conclusion The bloodless revolution in Czechoslovakia, the violence in Romania resulting in the defeat of Communism and change of political leadership, the breaking up of the Soviet Union (the Baltic States were annexed by Stalin in 1940), the trouble to the leadership of Gorbachev and his eventual resignation, were all serious issues but did not merit the military intervention by U.... The Bush Administration encountered many situations for which it had to consider the option of intervention with military force....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Research Proposal: Intervention and Post-Conflict Growth

The paper seeks to answer whether humanitarian intervention really helps the receiving country or not.... The main hypothesis of this paper is that humanitarian intervention has no significant impact on the post-war growth, both democratic and economic.... The concept of humanitarian intervention in modern times has taken a vital status along with Security Council authorization and self-defence as a legitimate and legal reason to declare war....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

How Useful Is Waltzs Theory for Explaining What Happens in International Politics

A multidisciplinary approach to evaluating the causes of war in world politics was according to Kenneth Waltz the best method of understanding military conflicts with a high degree of adaptability, as well as relevance even for understanding present-day international relations (Brown with Ainley, 2005 p....
14 Pages (3500 words) Term Paper

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua

They also argued that the regional negotiations known as the Contadora process made the intervention of the World Court unnecessary and that even if the Contadora process did not preempt World Court intervention the dispute was in the jurisdiction of the United Nations Security Council alone.... This case study "military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua" discusses Nicaragua's Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional (FSLN) that overthrew the Somoza dictatorship and formed the Sandinista Junta of National Reconstruction government in Nicaragua....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us